John Bercow MP
Speaker of the House,
The House of Commons,
8th February 2017
Invited Visit from the Queen to President Trump
Dear Speaker John Bercow MP,
I cannot address you by your honorific title, because in my humble opinion you do not deserve it, and have besmirched not only the position you hold, but also the House of Commons, our Government, and Her Majesty, with your disgracefully inaccurate, hypocritical outburst in the House regarding President Trump addressing the Sovereign people’s parliament, especially as you have allowed other inhumane heads of state the honour and privilege.
You failed in your remit to be impartial, and therefore you have made your position untenable, as speaker and should stand down from the role.
You abused your power, and brought disrepute not only to the House, but also to the country and it’s people, the silent majority of whom would welcome President Trump and his policies.
You are not employed to impose your views on the populace, but to abide by the majority of the Sovereign people’s views.
We would welcome the kind of restrictions on immigration that the President proposes, in order to keep the people of this country safe from Taharrush Gamea (Collective Assault on women and girls) as has been rife in Rotherham and elsewhere, by uncivilised, predatory peadophiles whose book tells them, these practices are normal and OK for Islamic males during Jihad, because enemy females are spoils of war/slaves to be used for their lusts. “Those their right hand possesses”.
Qur’an Sura 4 approx verse 39: “Men are superior to women on account of the qualities which God hath gifted the one above the other, and on account of the outlay they make from their substance for them.”………………”chide those (women) for whose refractoriness ye have cause to fear; remove them into beds apart, and scourge them:”
Qur’an Sura (33:50) – “O Prophet! surely We have made lawful to you your wives whom you have given their dowries, and those whom your right hand possesses out of those whom Allah has given to you as prisoners of war,
(Al Hadis, Vol. 2, p. 686) Ibn Masud reported, “We were fighting with the Messenger of Allah…………and then he allowed us Muta (temporary) marriage. So, we all married wives for a fixed time (usually three days) for the dowry of a piece of cloth.”
These three passages alone should serve to exclude any people who consider them ok in Western society, yet you cry racism and shout down those who advocate reasonable steps to prevent harm to this country and it’s people.
Here is a speech delivered by the man and statesman you will never be;
“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.
A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.
Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it.
No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step, and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.”
Sir Winston Churchill;
(Source: The River War, first edition, Vol. II, pages 248-50 London )
Europe is already experiencing severe problems from this cult, yet you would open our borders to them, read this;
“So O muwahhid, do not let this battle pass you by wherever you may be. You must strike the soldiers, patrons, and troops of the tawaghit. Strike their police, security, and intelligence members, as well as their treacherous agents. Destroy their beds. Embitter their lives for them and busy them with themselves. If you can kill a disbelieving American or European — especially the spiteful and filthy French — or an Australian, or a Canadian, or any other disbeliever from the disbelievers waging war, including the citizens of the countries that entered into a coalition against the Islamic State, then rely upon Allah, and kill him in any manner or way however it may be….If you are not able to find an IED or a bullet, then single out the disbelieving American, Frenchman, or any of their allies. Smash his head with a rock, or slaughter him with a knife, or run him over with your car, or throw him down from a high place, or choke him, or poison him….”
Bill of Right 1688
“I A B doe sweare That I doe from my Heart Abhorr, Detest and Abjure as Impious and Hereticall this damnable Doctrine and Position That Princes Excommunicated or Deprived by the Pope or any Authority of the See of Rome may be deposed or murdered by their Subjects or any otherwhatsoever. And I doe declare That noe Forreigne Prince Person Prelate, State or Potentate hathor ought to have any Jurisdiction Power Superiority Preeminence or Authoritie Ecclesiasticallor Spirituall within this Realme Soe helpe me God.
That the said Lords Spirituall and Temporall and Commons being the two Houses of Parlyament should continue to sitt and with their Majesties Royall Concurrence make effectuall Provision for the Setlement of the Religion Lawes and Liberties of this Kingdome soe that the same for the future might not be in danger againe of being subverted,……………………………….That all and singular the Rights and Liberties asserted and claimed in the said Declaration are the true auntient and indubitable Rights and Liberties of the People of this Kingdome and soe shall be esteemed allowed adjudged deemed and taken to be and that all and every the particulars aforesaid shall be firmly and strictly holden and observed as they are expressed in the said Declaration And all Officers and Ministers whatsoever shall serve their Majestyes and their Successors according to the same in all times to come. “
If you refuse to honour Queen Elizabeth’s guest, you are placing yourself above Her Majesty in the position entirely reserved for God. That constitutes an act of Treason contrary to the 1351 Treason Act, and I would be happy to escort you to the Tower of London should the need arise.
I respectfully suggest that you withdraw your objections, and stop working for the Marxist zealots of the New World Order, against the people you are supposed to represent.
English Constitution Group